RESUMEN
Introduction: Children with type 1 diabetes require close monitoring with visits every 3-4 months. COVID-19-induced telemedicine expansion may alleviate the challenge of high visit frequency that children with type 1 diabetes face. However, telemedicine's impact on access to care may be limited if patients lack adequate support for telemedicine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of telemedicine care coordination services on visit frequency in an urban medical center without care coordination services versus a rural outreach program with established care coordination services serviced by the same providers. Methods: We evaluated EHR data from 790 children receiving care between July 2018 and December 2021 at a single academic center in Oregon. We estimated differences in likelihood of adequately timed monitoring care over time by patient care coordination services status using Generalized Estimating Equations. Results: Just prior to telemedicine expansion, patients receiving care coordination services were 25.6 % less likely to receive adequately timed monitoring care (95 % CI: 51.6 %, 114 %). Following telemedicine expansion, likelihood of adequately timed monitoring care increased from 28.8 % to 58.2 % among those receiving care coordination services and decreased from 38.7 % to 22.0 % among those not receiving care coordination services; increases in adequately timed monitoring care were 3.55 times greater in patients receiving care coordination services relative to those not (95 % CI: 2.10, 6.01). Discussion: For pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes, telemedicine care coordination may be an important factor for increasing visit adherence and may increase the number of patients meeting goal visit frequency beyond levels seen prior to widespread telemedicine availability.
RESUMEN
Objective: The telemedicine expansion (TE) that accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic presents a novel opportunity to increase access to care for rural-residing children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who may live a great distance from their provider. The study objective was to compare trends in visit frequency among the pediatric T1D population at a single academic center in Oregon before and after TE by those living <100 miles versus ≥100 miles from clinic (MFC) and those residing in urban versus rural areas. Research Design and Methods: We evaluated electronic health record data from 790 children receiving care between July 2018 and December 2021. We estimated differences in likelihood of adequately timed monitoring care (ATMC) over time by patient residence using Generalized Estimating Equations. Results: Just before TE, 37.3% of children were receiving ATMC and those living ≥100 MFC were 20.6% less likely to receive ATMC compared with those living <100 MFC (relative risk [RR] 0.79; confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.57-1.11). Following TE, decreases in ATMC for those living ≥100 MFC were less than for those living <100 MFC (RR of interaction: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-2.00). Just before TE, those living in rural areas were as likely to receive ATMC compared with those living in urban areas (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.61-1.63). Following TE, decreases in ATMC were greater for those living in rural areas versus urban areas (RR of interaction: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.31-2.01). Conclusions: Between July 2020 and December 2021, the likelihood of ATMC decreased across the entire pediatric T1D population. Decreases in ATMC during this period were more substantial for those living <100 MFC and/or in rural areas, however, these discrepancies were not statistically significant.
